Thursday 24 February 2022

Fun and games, nr 2: Another question of perspective.

Hello my friends, 

A few weeks ago I showed you the diorama or peep show that was a popular way of entertainment in the seventeen and eighteen hundreds. The next subjects popularity in this little series about historical fun and games was rather shortlived. It became popular in the mid 17th century but fell out of favour already 25 years later. 

Why? It involves a lot of artistic skill and mathematical knowledge of the maker. Therefore these were expensive and not every artiest could make one. Another downside is that you can not change the scènes like with a diorama. So people actualy got bored with them and many ended up as a oddity in someones art collection or attic, no longer recognised for their ingenuity. 

The painted perspective box. 

Detroit Institute of Arts 

As the title suggests I am talking about the perspective box. Here not a succession of drawings make up a three dimensional scene like in the diorama, but a single scene is painted on the inside of a triangular or rectangular box in such a (distorted) way to suggest a perfect image when seen from the right vantagepoint. As I said, few were made, and even fewer have survived until this day. 

Bredius Museum (Den Haag) 

Only 6 are known to be in existence today. They are all from the middle of the 17th century and seem to be made as object d'art that display the skill and talent of the artist who made them. Rather than simple divertisment like the diorama. 


In other words. The perspective box was not meant as 'simple' entertainment. It's place is rather among the paintings and objects in an art collection. But the (unsuspecting) person who looks into it will be astonished and entertained none the less. The painter of the box I have used here is Samuel van Hoogstraten. And this box can be seen in the National Gallery in London. 


Why did I choose this box. Partly because this box is photographed inside and out and these photos are available on the internet, although it was a hell of a job to find them. 

National Gallery (London) 

But I also chose this one because it is a great and beautiful object! But without these high quality pictures I would not have a chance to to make a miniature version that is this precise. 


Here too I used the card board. I glued the printed paintings on the cardboard. Then I cut the panels out with 2mm allowances where another panel was to be glued in place. The holes in the sides were "expertly" made with the use of a standerd office perforator. luckily the diameter of the perforator was almost perfectly scaled!

Then I needed to add an extra layer of card to the top and the bottom so I can add an apropriate moulding along the top and bottom of the box, somewhat similar as with the original box. 

Once that was done I glued on the painted scenes that Samuel van Hoogstraten added to the outside of the back and the side panels. Each panel on the outside shows the artist (from the back) at work and a little angel pointing at him. Each with a their own motto in latin. 

They translate as: For the sake of money, for the sake of honour, for the sake of art. 

I see it as an elegant way to describe the treadwheel any artist not born into wealth has to walk in. He needs to sell art to make money. He needs money to be able to make art. And he needs a good reputation to sell his art in the first place and to make them pay more than time and material invested into it.

I finally added the quite risqué scene of a naked lady stepping out of her bed. With cupid reveiling a little more than is apropriate by pulling away the bedsheat. Unfortunately, this last picture can only be seen in the right perspective with the use of a concave mirror or lense with the right curvature. When you look in the round mirror glass, place at the far end of this picture you should see the distorted picture as if it would be in the correct perspective. A concave mirror is something I do not have unfortunately.

I guess it is painted on the top so that children could not see it. A little naughty joke for the adults to enjoy? If they have a curved mirror that is. Or it could just be there for practical reasons. It is the only side where you can place a concave mirror without having to hold it on you hands all the time. 

Then all left to do was painting the whole thing black and varnish it several times. I pondered about distressing the box but decided against it. I did however added some beads onderneath as feet for the box to stand on. Ik is quite a big thing and it looks massive. Raising it on the low but decorated feet makes it look a bit less massive. The plastic beads are recycled from an old Christmas decoration and painted black.

And there we have it. A miniature perspective box painted by Samuel van Hoogstraten. One of the difficulties of perspective boxes is that they only work from one fixed point. From there the painted panels form a perfect picture together. Any other viewpoint and it does not work. 

While looking through the hole on the left.

The perspective it only works when peering through one of the two holes in the side panels. Looking through them into the oposite corner gives you the right perspective. When you look closely you see where the bottom panel goes over into the side panels and where those go over into the painted top panel. But the painted floor, walls and ceiling of the room ignore those lines of the box and present one continuing picture to your eye. 

The open front ( with this box) is only meant to let the (sun- or candle) light into the perspective box. When you look into the box from the front (see the second picture from the top) the illusion does not work at all.

While looking through the hole on the right.

Well, this is the second item used to entertain and impress guests. I hope that you have found it as 'entertaining' to read about it as I have found making it. 

The next one will be the model theatre. Stay turned! 

Huibrecht 

7 comments:

  1. Hi Huibrecht! This is certainly a fascinating box! That you have successfully made it in miniature is really brilliant! The "mathematics" required for the perspective to be accurate would be truly challenging. (I have a hard enough time with run-of-the-mill perspective in my drawings.) That there are so few of these is not surprising. I do think it is an ingenious project! :):)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Betsy,

      There is some intricate mathematics at work. Even with a book on perspective in drawings I would not be able to paint something that comes anywhere close to the original box made by Samuel van Hoogstraten.

      That the prints of the paintings on the outside, bugs me. I want to remedy that in the near future.

      Huibrecht

      Delete
  2. Oh my, I'm really late this time... but this way I'm able to enjoy three wonderful posts filled with topics of all sorts but always stunning and fascinating.

    As always it's a pleasure not only to admire the awesome miniature version of the piece you made but also to learn about its history. I can only agree with Betsy, it's not surprising that there are only just a few excisting. But the more special it is - and it's just the perfect piece for your very special project. Wonderful work... and I'm already anticipating the next one. ;O)

    Hugs
    Birgit

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Birgit,

      Being late is a relative thing in this case. Usualy I do not post every week. So it could have just been one post. :-)

      I am glad that you like reading about the history too! The next one will probably take a bit longer. I had to rethink how I will build it. The chosen way does not work as intended. back to the drawingboard.

      Huibrecht

      Delete